Conference Awards and Criteria
As the conference would like to recognize the researchers who have exemplarily performed in the presentation, and who have submitted a well-written manuscript, awards will be given to participants:
- Best Conference Paper
- Best Oral Presenter
- Best Extension Paper
- Best Poster
- other Special Awards
Criteria for Best Conference Paper (per track):
CRITERIA: | Ideal Rating |
ORIGINALITY (20%) | |
1. Provision for new ideas. | 10 |
2. Observance of IPR and proper acknowledgment of sources. | 10 |
TECHNICAL MERIT OF THE STUDY (30%) | |
1. Adequacy, attainability, and clarity of the objectives. | 10 |
2. Clarity of the Rationale and state-of-the-art to analyze the problem. | 5 |
3. Methodology a. Appropriate of research design and statistical tools. b. Sufficiency and relevance of variables. c. Adequacy of data collection method. | 10 |
4. Consistency of the activities with the research objectives methodology and expected outputs. | 5 |
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDINGS (40%) | |
1. Importance of the project. | 10 |
2. Contribution to science, art, rural households, industry, instruction, community sector, regional or national development. | 10 |
3. Usefulness of the expected outputs or findings to increase in scientific workforce. | 10 |
4. Superiority of outputs to the existing knowledge/ information/ technology. | 10 |
MANUSCRIPT/WRITE-UP (10%) | |
1. Appropriateness and accuracy of languages (tone) and figures. | 5 |
2. Clarity, style, and logic | 5 |
TOTAL –> | 100 |