Conference Awards and Criteria
As the conference would like to recognize the researchers who have exemplarily performed in the presentation, and who have submitted a well-written manuscript, awards will be given to participants:
- Best Conference Paper
- Best Oral Presenter
- Best Extension Paper
- Best Poster
- other Special Awards
Criteria for Best Conference Paper (per track):
|1. Provision for new ideas.||10|
|2. Observance of IPR and proper acknowledgment of sources.||10|
|TECHNICAL MERIT OF THE STUDY (30%)|
|1. Adequacy, attainability, and clarity of the objectives.||10|
|2. Clarity of the Rationale and state-of-the-art to analyze the problem.||5|
a. Appropriate of research design and statistical tools.
b. Sufficiency and relevance of variables.
c. Adequacy of data collection method.
|4. Consistency of the activities with the research objectives methodology and expected outputs.||5|
|SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDINGS (40%)|
|1. Importance of the project.||10|
|2. Contribution to science, art, rural households, industry, instruction, community sector, regional or national development.||10|
|3. Usefulness of the expected outputs or findings to increase in scientific workforce.||10|
|4. Superiority of outputs to the existing knowledge/ information/ technology.||10|
|1. Appropriateness and accuracy of languages (tone) and figures.||5|
|2. Clarity, style, and logic||5|